Compare how Tim Ayres and Nita Green voted on a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
![Photo of Tim Ayres](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10946.jpg)
Tim Ayres
Australian Labor Party Senator for NSW since July 2019
![Photo of Nita Green](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10950.jpg)
Nita Green
Australian Labor Party Senator for Queensland since July 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should unify the Federal Circuit Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia so that they are one court to be known as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Tim Ayres or Nita Green could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Ayres and Nita Green on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Tim Ayres | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
17th Feb 2021, 9:40 PM – Senate Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
No | No | Yes |
17th Feb 2021, 7:13 PM – Senate Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
No | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a combined Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia” which either Tim Ayres or Nita Green could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Tim Ayres | Nita Green | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |