We can't say anything concrete about how Sam Dastyari voted on reducing taxes for middle-income earners
How Sam Dastyari voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce income tax for middle-income earners (those who earn more than $80,000 per year)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing taxes for middle-income earners” which Sam Dastyari could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam Dastyari on this policy.
| Division | Sam Dastyari | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2016, 1:56 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Income Tax Relief) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing taxes for middle-income earners” which Sam Dastyari could have attended.
| Division | Sam Dastyari | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sam Dastyari was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.