We can't say anything concrete about how Sam Dastyari voted on targeting foreign interference in Australia
How Sam Dastyari voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should address the issue of foreign interference in Australia by, for example, introducing new offences against acts such as sabotage, treason and espionage
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for targeting foreign interference in Australia” which Sam Dastyari could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sam Dastyari on this policy.
| Division | Sam Dastyari | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for targeting foreign interference in Australia” which Sam Dastyari could have attended.
| Division | Sam Dastyari | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sam Dastyari was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.