We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Forshaw voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
How Michael Forshaw voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Michael Forshaw could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Forshaw on this policy.
| Division | Michael Forshaw | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Michael Forshaw could have attended.
| Division | Michael Forshaw | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2008, 3:48 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Act on conference conclusions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Forshaw was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.