Compare how Michael Forshaw and Rod Kemp voted on increasing protection of Australia's fresh water

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which either Michael Forshaw or Rod Kemp could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Forshaw and Rod Kemp on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michael Forshaw	Rod Kemp	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which either Michael Forshaw or Rod Kemp could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michael Forshaw	Rod Kemp	Supporters vote
22nd Jun 2010, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Water Supply for Adelaide	absent	-	Yes
26th Mar 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Purchase water licences	Yes	No	Yes
26th Mar 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - World Day for Water - South Australian wetlands	Yes	No	Yes
8th Feb 2007, 10:42 AM – Senate Motions - Water - Macquarie River	Yes	No	Yes
7th Dec 2006, 10:03 AM – Senate Motions - Wetlands and Floodplains - Murray Darling	absent	No	Yes