We can't say anything concrete about how Mark Arbib voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
How Mark Arbib voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Mark Arbib could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Arbib on this policy.
| Division | Mark Arbib | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Mark Arbib could have attended.
| Division | Mark Arbib | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Suspend applications and approvals until after UNESCO assessment |
No | Yes |
9th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Suspend applications and approvals until after UNESCO assessment |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2011 – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Moratorium on new coal seam gas approvals |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Mark Arbib has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.