How Marise Payne voted compared to someone who agrees that all native title claimants need to sign an Indigenous Land Use Agreement before the Agreement can be registered by the Native Title Registrar (agreements like this let, for example, mining companies mine in an area covered by native title)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements” which Marise Payne could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marise Payne on this policy.

Division Marise Payne Supporters vote

13th Jun 2017, 7:26 PM – Senate Native Title Amendment (Indigenous Land Use Agreements) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

absent No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring every native title claimant to sign land use agreements” which Marise Payne could have attended.

Division Marise Payne Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Marise Payne was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.