![Photo of Maria Kovacic](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/11014.jpg)
We can't say anything concrete about how Maria Kovacic voted on encouraging Australian-based industry
How Maria Kovacic voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage Australian-based industry and secure the jobs these industries create by, for example, providing incentives for companies to stay in Australia (note that there are specific policies in respect to the timber, dairy, shipping, coal, and film & TV industries, which means that votes specific to those subjects are not included here)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Maria Kovacic could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Maria Kovacic on this policy.
Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Maria Kovacic could have attended.
Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
21st Jun 2023, 4:49 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Maria Kovacic was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.