We can't say anything concrete about how Maria Kovacic voted on no new fossil fuels projects
How Maria Kovacic voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban all new fossil fuel projects (oil, gas, coal) (for those votes that relate specifically to new thermal coal mines, see the policy "for banning new thermal coal mines")
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Maria Kovacic could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Maria Kovacic on this policy.
| Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2023, 5:56 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - in Committee - No new fossil fuel facilities |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Maria Kovacic could have attended.
| Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th May 2024, 5:07 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Great Barrier Reef - National emergency |
absent | Yes |
21st Jun 2023, 4:49 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Maria Kovacic was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.