We can't say anything concrete about how Maria Kovacic voted on unconventional gas mining
How Maria Kovacic voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Maria Kovacic could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Maria Kovacic on this policy.
| Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Maria Kovacic could have attended.
| Division | Maria Kovacic | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2024, 6:04 PM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2024-2025 and four others - Second Reading - Coal and gas |
absent | No |
16th May 2024, 6:21 PM – Senate Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Legislation Amendment (Safety and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Opposition amendments |
Yes | Yes |
14th Nov 2023, 12:36 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Australia's Engagement in the Pacific) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Fossil fuels |
absent | No |
21st Jun 2023, 4:49 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Maria Kovacic has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.