We can't say anything concrete about how Kristina Keneally voted on a carbon price
How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a carbon pricing mechanism
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a carbon price” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a carbon price” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Mar 2021, 4:53 PM – Senate Motions - Trade with the European Union - Emissions reduction targets |
absent | Yes |
22nd Feb 2021, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Carbon market |
absent | Yes |
28th Nov 2018, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Carbon price |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kristina Keneally was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.