How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish an independent inquiry into whether Attorney-General Christian Porter is fit to remain in his role in light of the recent sexual assault allegation

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an independent inquiry into Attorney-General Christian Porter” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.

Division Kristina Keneally Supporters vote

22nd Jun 2021, 4:14 PM – Senate Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 - First Reading - Consider the bill without delay

absent Yes

16th Jun 2021, 4:00 PM – Senate Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 - First Reading - Consider the bill

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an independent inquiry into Attorney-General Christian Porter” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.

Division Kristina Keneally Supporters vote

17th Mar 2021, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Independent Inquiry into Sexual Assault Allegations - Attorney-General

Yes Yes

16th Mar 2021, 4:38 PM – Senate Motions - Attorney-General - Independent inquiry

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Kristina Keneally has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.