We can't say anything concrete about how Kristina Keneally voted on ending government investment in fossil fuels
How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should stop all investment in fossil fuels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.
Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.
Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
20th Oct 2021, 4:45 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Fuel Security (Fuel Security Services Payment) Rule 2021 - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
12th May 2021, 5:41 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Budget - Climate change |
absent | Yes |
12th Nov 2019, 1:49 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Coal-fired power generators |
No | Yes |
24th Jul 2019, 12:19 PM – Senate Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - Fossil fuels |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kristina Keneally has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.