We can't say anything concrete about how Kristina Keneally voted on a Royal Commission into Robodebt
How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission to investigate the government's Robodebt scheme, officially known as the Online Compliance Intervention, which related to automated debt recovery
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Robodebt” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Robodebt” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Dec 2020, 5:05 PM – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Robodebt |
absent | Yes |
27th Aug 2020 – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Establish Robodebt Royal Commission |
absent | Yes |
16th Jun 2020, 4:55 PM – Senate Motions - Pensions and Benefits - Establish Royal Commission into Robodebt |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kristina Keneally was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.