We can't say anything concrete about how Kristina Keneally voted on building community climate change resilience
How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should invest in efforts to increase community resilience to extreme weather events, such as bushfires and floods
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for building community climate change resilience” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for building community climate change resilience” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2019, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Drought |
absent | Yes |
13th Nov 2019, 4:49 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Bushfires - Climate Change |
absent | Yes |
17th Oct 2019, 10:51 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Invest |
No | Yes |
10th Sep 2019, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland - Bushfires |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kristina Keneally has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.