We can't say anything concrete about how Kristina Keneally voted on increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship
How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should take a restrictive approach to granting Australian citizenship by introducing more eligibility requirements, such as applicants needing greater English language proficiency and needing to spend more time living in Australia before they can submit their applications
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2020, 12:13 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Languages - Role of English in Australia |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kristina Keneally was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.