How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should amend its laws and policies to meet the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.

Division Kristina Keneally Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.

Division Kristina Keneally Supporters vote

3rd Dec 2020, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Kyoto carryover credits

absent Yes

16th Oct 2019, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change, Petroleum Industry - No new coal, oil or gas projects

absent Yes

16th Oct 2019, 4:35 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address and adapt

absent Yes

16th Oct 2019, 4:12 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address

absent Yes

4th Dec 2018, 5:12 PM – Senate Documents - Climate Change - Withdraw from Paris Climate Accord

absent No

14th Aug 2018, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Withdraw

No No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Kristina Keneally has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.