We can't say anything concrete about how Kristina Keneally voted on federal government action on animal & plant extinctions
How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Feb 2021, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - White Rock Quarry - Halt expansion |
absent | Yes |
30th Nov 2020, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Environment - Protect Koala Habitat |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2018, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity - Heed recommendations |
absent | Yes |
14th Feb 2018, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmania: Environment - Tarkine |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kristina Keneally was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.