We can't say anything concrete about how Kristina Keneally voted on privatising certain government services
How Kristina Keneally voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give the private sector control over running and managing some of its services (such as public welfare, aged care and visa services) by either outsourcing or privatisation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Kristina Keneally could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kristina Keneally on this policy.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which Kristina Keneally could have attended.
| Division | Kristina Keneally | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2020, 1:40 PM – Senate Services Australia Governance Amendment Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Staffing caps and privatisation |
absent | No |
26th Feb 2020, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Aged Care - Privatisation |
absent | No |
26th Feb 2020, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Aged Care - ACAT privatisation |
absent | No |
25th Feb 2020, 4:56 PM – Senate Motions - Aged Care - Privatising Aged Care Assessment Teams (ACAT) |
absent | No |
24th Feb 2020, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Public Transport - Privatisation |
absent | No |
6th Feb 2020, 12:21 PM – Senate Motions - Aged-Care Assessments - Privatisation + consult with states |
absent | No |
1st Aug 2019, 12:18 PM – Senate Committees - Visa Processing - Do not privatise |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kristina Keneally has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.