We can't say anything concrete about how John Williams voted on giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains
How John Williams voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should give approval for new mines in the Liverpool Plains, such as the Shenhua Watermark coal mine
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which John Williams could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Williams on this policy.
| Division | John Williams | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for giving approval for mining in the Liverpool Plains” which John Williams could have attended.
| Division | John Williams | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Nov 2017, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas Mining: Liverpool Plains - Moratorium |
absent | No |
10th Nov 2015, 3:55 PM – Senate Business - Coalmining - Oppose Shenhua Watermark coal mine |
absent | No |
3rd Mar 2015 – Senate Motions — Liverpool Plains |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Williams was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.