We can't say anything concrete about how John Faulkner voted on stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation
How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make it harder for individuals and corporations to avoid or aggressively minimise their Australian tax obligations and take part in international efforts to keep track of these individuals and corporations by sharing income and asset information
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner on this policy.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which John Faulkner could have attended.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Oct 2014, 12:15 PM – Senate Motions - Taxation - Corporate tax evasion |
absent | Yes |
25th Nov 2009, 4:49 PM – Senate Motions - Overseas Tax Havens - Deplorable |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Faulkner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.