We can't say anything concrete about how John Faulkner voted on increasing indexation of HECS-HELP debts
How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who agrees that Higher Education Loan Programme (HELP) debts - also known as HECS-HELP debts - should be indexed in line with the ten-year bond rate, capped at six per cent, instead of the generally lower rate of the Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing indexation of HECS-HELP debts” which John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner on this policy.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Dec 2014, 5:58 PM – Senate Higher Education and Research Reform Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing indexation of HECS-HELP debts” which John Faulkner could have attended.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Faulkner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.