We can't say anything concrete about how John Faulkner voted on reducing air pollution
How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop policies and legislation that reduce air pollution, including vehicle emissions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner on this policy.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which John Faulkner could have attended.
| Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
John Faulkner has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.