We can't say anything concrete about how John Faulkner voted on transgender rights
How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Faulkner on this policy.
Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which John Faulkner could have attended.
Division | John Faulkner | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
17th Jun 2013, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions — International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Faulkner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.