How John Faulkner voted compared to someone who believes that the federal government should take national action to increase housing affordability so that all Australians have the chance to buy their own home

Division John Faulkner Supporters vote Division outcome

18th Sep 2007, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Housing Affordability - Evidence-based national plan

Show detail

The majority voted against a motion calling for an evidence-based national affordable housing plan, which means it was unsuccessful. The motion was introduced by Greens Senator Rachel Siewert (WA).

Motion text

That the Senate calls on the Government to:

(a) review all taxes, grants and concessions, including negative gearing, capital gains tax exemptions and first home owners grants, to assess their impact on the housing market; and

(b) work with the states and territories to develop an evidence-based national affordable housing plan.

absent Yes Not passed by a large majority

How "never voted" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Faulkner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete other than that they have "never voted" on this policy.