We can't say anything concrete about how Jim Molan voted on no new fossil fuels projects
How Jim Molan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban all new fossil fuel projects (oil, gas, coal) (for those votes that relate specifically to new thermal coal mines, see the policy "for banning new thermal coal mines")
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Jim Molan could have attended.
| Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Sep 2022, 10:00 AM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Acknowledge need to end fossil fuels |
absent | Yes |
13th May 2021, 2:48 PM – Senate Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment (Extension and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - New fossil fuel projects |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jim Molan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.