We can't say anything concrete about how Jim Molan voted on a travel ban on people from certain countries
How Jim Molan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a travel ban on people from certain countries for national security reasons
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a travel ban on people from certain countries” which Jim Molan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jim Molan on this policy.
Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a travel ban on people from certain countries” which Jim Molan could have attended.
Division | Jim Molan | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
12th Feb 2019, 5:08 PM – Senate Motions - National Security - Trump-style travel ban |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jim Molan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.