We can't say anything concrete about how Hollie Hughes voted on increasing restrictions on gambling
How Hollie Hughes voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase restrictions on the gambling industry in order to address the issue of problem gambling
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Hollie Hughes could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Hollie Hughes on this policy.
| Division | Hollie Hughes | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Hollie Hughes could have attended.
| Division | Hollie Hughes | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Oct 2024, 3:46 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling Advertising - Ban |
absent | Yes |
14th Aug 2024, 4:40 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Gambling Advertising - Ban |
absent | Yes |
29th Jul 2019, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - A new inquiry |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Hollie Hughes was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.