How Hollie Hughes voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should tighten the ministerial code of conduct to stop former ministers from taking up lobbying positions - including in-house positions - within five years of leaving Parliament

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Hollie Hughes could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Hollie Hughes on this policy.

Division Hollie Hughes Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Hollie Hughes could have attended.

Division Hollie Hughes Supporters vote

22nd Jul 2019, 3:55 PM – Senate Committees - Finance and Public Administration References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Hollie Hughes was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.