We can't say anything concrete about how Helen Coonan voted on carbon farming
How Helen Coonan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a carbon farming initiative that encourages the farming and timber industries to decrease carbon emissions or to increase carbon storage (known as carbon sequestration)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for carbon farming” which Helen Coonan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Helen Coonan on this policy.
| Division | Helen Coonan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for carbon farming” which Helen Coonan could have attended.
| Division | Helen Coonan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Aug 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - In Committee - Greenhouse Friendly program |
absent | No |
6th Jul 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - In Committee - Future act provisions and State/Territory minister consent |
absent | No |
6th Jul 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Consider further after 10 July 2011 |
absent | No |
6th Jul 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Consider further after regulations laid on the table |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Helen Coonan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.