We can't say anything concrete about how Helen Coonan voted on increasing protection of Australia's fresh water
How Helen Coonan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the protection of Australia's fresh water resources, including its river and groundwater systems
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Helen Coonan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Helen Coonan on this policy.
| Division | Helen Coonan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing protection of Australia's fresh water” which Helen Coonan could have attended.
| Division | Helen Coonan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2010, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Water Supply for Adelaide |
absent | Yes |
26th Mar 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Murray-Darling Basin - Purchase water licences |
absent | Yes |
26th Mar 2007, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - World Day for Water - South Australian wetlands |
absent | Yes |
8th Feb 2007, 10:42 AM – Senate Motions - Water - Macquarie River |
absent | Yes |
7th Dec 2006, 10:03 AM – Senate Motions - Wetlands and Floodplains - Murray Darling |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Helen Coonan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.