How George Campbell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect threatened forest and bushland habitats from logging.

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which George Campbell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of George Campbell on this policy.

Division George Campbell Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which George Campbell could have attended.

Division George Campbell Supporters vote

29th Nov 2006, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Logging in Tasmania’s Weld River Valley - Halt logging

absent Yes

28th Mar 2006, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Wedge-Tailed Eagle - Protect habitat

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

George Campbell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.