We can't say anything concrete about how Fiona Nash voted on increasing competition in bulk wheat export
How Fiona Nash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should deregulate Australia's wheat export market so that bulk wheat export is no longer done through a single exporter (which is known as a 'single desk' policy)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Fiona Nash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash on this policy.
| Division | Fiona Nash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Jun 2008, 8:46 PM – Senate Wheat Export Marketing Bill 2008 and Wheat Export Marketing (Repeal and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2008 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2008, 12:41 PM – Senate Wheat Export Marketing Bill 2008 and Wheat Export Marketing (Repeal and Consequential Amendments) Bill 2008 — Second Reading — Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing competition in bulk wheat export” which Fiona Nash could have attended.
| Division | Fiona Nash | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fiona Nash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.