How Fiona Nash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban both direct and indirect (e.g. through parent companies) investment in cluster munitions

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Fiona Nash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash on this policy.

Division Fiona Nash Supporters vote

21st Aug 2012, 1:44 PM – Senate Criminal Code Amendment (Cluster Munitions Prohibition) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Ban investment

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Fiona Nash could have attended.

Division Fiona Nash Supporters vote

12th May 2011 – Senate Motions - Cluster Bombs - Extend prohibitions

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fiona Nash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.