We can't say anything concrete about how Fiona Nash voted on banning all investment in cluster munitions
How Fiona Nash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban both direct and indirect (e.g. through parent companies) investment in cluster munitions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Fiona Nash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash on this policy.
| Division | Fiona Nash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Aug 2012, 1:44 PM – Senate Criminal Code Amendment (Cluster Munitions Prohibition) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Ban investment |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Fiona Nash could have attended.
| Division | Fiona Nash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th May 2011 – Senate Motions - Cluster Bombs - Extend prohibitions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fiona Nash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.