We can't say anything concrete about how Fiona Nash voted on strengthening gun control laws
How Fiona Nash voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain and strengthen gun control laws and make sure they're the same around Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for strengthening gun control laws” which Fiona Nash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash on this policy.
| Division | Fiona Nash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Nov 2016, 8:34 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Customs (Prohibited Imports) Amendment (Shotguns and Shotgun Magazines) Regulation 2016 - Disallowance |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for strengthening gun control laws” which Fiona Nash could have attended.
| Division | Fiona Nash | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Sep 2016, 12:40 PM – Senate Motions - Gun Control - Strengthen laws |
absent | Yes |
21st Jun 2012, 12:14 PM – Senate Motions - Gun Control - Stregthen uniformity |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fiona Nash was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.