Compare how Fiona Nash and Rachel Siewert voted on pill testing

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for pill testing” which either Fiona Nash or Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash and Rachel Siewert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for pill testing” which either Fiona Nash or Rachel Siewert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
13th Feb 2019, 4:16 PM – Senate Motions - Illicit Drugs - Pill testing	-	Yes	Yes
5th Sep 2017, 5:24 PM – Senate Motions - International Overdose Awareness Day - Address harms of drug use	No	Yes	Yes
13th Feb 2017, 4:05 PM – Senate Motions - Illicit Drugs - Pill testing	No	Yes	Yes