Compare how Fiona Nash and Rachel Siewert voted on increasing penalties for breach of data

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which either Fiona Nash or Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash and Rachel Siewert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
13th Oct 2016, 1:57 PM – Senate National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - in Committee - Protection of private data	No	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing penalties for breach of data” which either Fiona Nash or Rachel Siewert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
no votes listed