Compare how Fiona Nash and Anne Ruston voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which either Fiona Nash or Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash and Anne Ruston on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Anne Ruston	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which either Fiona Nash or Anne Ruston could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Fiona Nash	Anne Ruston	Supporters vote
11th Sep 2019, 4:10 PM – Senate Committees - Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee - Reference	-	No	Yes
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex	No	No	No
17th Jul 2014, 4:57 PM – Senate Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014 and Asset Recycling Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014 — In Committee — Toll roads	No	No	No
27th Jun 2013, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions — Infrastructure and Transport Funding: Roe Highway - Do not fund	absent	No	No