Compare how Fiona Nash and Anne Ruston voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
Fiona Nash
Former National Party Senator for NSW July 2005 – October 2017
Anne Ruston
Liberal Party Senator for SA since September 2012
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which either Fiona Nash or Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fiona Nash and Anne Ruston on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Fiona Nash | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which either Fiona Nash or Anne Ruston could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".