How Doug Cameron voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support Australia joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement, a trade agreement between countries along the rim of the Pacific Ocean, including Canada and New Zealand

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement” which Doug Cameron could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Doug Cameron on this policy.

Division Doug Cameron Supporters vote

17th Oct 2018, 12:40 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills

absent Yes

15th Oct 2018, 9:29 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement” which Doug Cameron could have attended.

Division Doug Cameron Supporters vote

17th Oct 2018, 12:32 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - in Committee - Sunset clause

absent No

17th Oct 2018, 11:30 AM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Commencement

absent No

16th Oct 2018, 6:49 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Commencement

absent No

15th Oct 2018, 9:25 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - Second Reading - Postpone consideration

absent No

19th Apr 2016, 7:29 PM – Senate Motions - Steel Industry - Support local industry

No No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Doug Cameron has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.