How Doug Cameron voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make sure that a planned fleet of 12 new submarines is built in South Australia (this new fleet was proposed in 2013 to replace the existing Collins Class submarine fleet)

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Doug Cameron could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Doug Cameron on this policy.

Division Doug Cameron Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Doug Cameron could have attended.

Division Doug Cameron Supporters vote

26th Nov 2014, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Censure the Minister for Defence

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Doug Cameron was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.