How Doug Cameron voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should tighten the ministerial code of conduct to stop former ministers from taking up lobbying positions - including in-house positions - within five years of leaving Parliament

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Doug Cameron could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Doug Cameron on this policy.

Division Doug Cameron Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping former ministers from taking lobbying positions within five years” which Doug Cameron could have attended.

Division Doug Cameron Supporters vote

19th Sep 2018, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist"

absent Yes

19th Sep 2018, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Lobbying to Political Parties - Change definition of "lobbyist"

absent Yes

18th Sep 2018, 4:58 PM – Senate Motions - Ministerial Conduct - Tighten

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Doug Cameron has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.