Compare how David Shoebridge and Nick McKim voted on encouraging Australian-based industry
![Photo of David Shoebridge](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/11010.jpg)
David Shoebridge
Australian Greens Senator for NSW since May 2022
![Photo of Nick McKim](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10841.jpg)
Nick McKim
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since August 2015
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage Australian-based industry and secure the jobs these industries create by, for example, providing incentives for companies to stay in Australia (note that there are specific policies in respect to the timber, dairy, shipping, coal, and film & TV industries, which means that votes specific to those subjects are not included here)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which either David Shoebridge or Nick McKim could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Shoebridge and Nick McKim on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | David Shoebridge | Nick McKim | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which either David Shoebridge or Nick McKim could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".