We can't say anything concrete about how David Leyonhjelm voted on increasing funding for university education
How David Leyonhjelm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which David Leyonhjelm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Leyonhjelm on this policy.
| Division | David Leyonhjelm | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which David Leyonhjelm could have attended.
| Division | David Leyonhjelm | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Sep 2016, 9:16 PM – Senate Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Higher education funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Leyonhjelm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.