Compare how David Leyonhjelm and Zed Seselja voted on the use of strong encryption technologies

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which either David Leyonhjelm or Zed Seselja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Leyonhjelm and Zed Seselja on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Leyonhjelm Zed Seselja Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the use of strong encryption technologies” which either David Leyonhjelm or Zed Seselja could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division David Leyonhjelm Zed Seselja Supporters vote

6th Dec 2018, 7:22 PM – Senate Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes No

6th Dec 2018, 7:09 PM – Senate Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea

No Yes No

15th Aug 2018, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Warrant and privacy

Yes absent Yes

23rd Feb 2016, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Digital Encryption - Develop technology

Yes No Yes

14th Nov 2013, 11:34 AM – Senate Motions - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee Reference - Surveillance

- No Yes