We can't say anything concrete about how Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted on withdrawing troops from Afghanistan
How Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should begin to withdraw Australian troops from Afghanistan as soon as safely possible
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan” which Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Concetta Fierravanti-Wells on this policy.
| Division | Concetta Fierravanti-Wells | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan” which Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended.
| Division | Concetta Fierravanti-Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Mar 2012, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Afghanistan - Safe withdrawal + increase in civilian aid |
absent | Yes |
31st Oct 2011 – Senate Matters of Urgency - Afghanistan - Confirm withdrawal date |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Concetta Fierravanti-Wells was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.