How Concetta Fierravanti-Wells voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a travel ban on people from certain countries for national security reasons

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a travel ban on people from certain countries” which Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Concetta Fierravanti-Wells on this policy.

Division Concetta Fierravanti-Wells Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a travel ban on people from certain countries” which Concetta Fierravanti-Wells could have attended.

Division Concetta Fierravanti-Wells Supporters vote

12th Feb 2019, 5:08 PM – Senate Motions - National Security - Trump-style travel ban

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Concetta Fierravanti-Wells has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.