We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Carr voted on implementing refugee and protection conventions
How Bob Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the international conventions that relate to seeking refuge and protection from torture. These include the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees and the non-refoulement provisions of the UN Convention Against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Bob Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Carr on this policy.
| Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Aug 2012, 8:31 PM – Senate Migration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing and Other Measures) Bill 2012 - In Committee - Protection and welfare arrangements |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for implementing refugee and protection conventions” which Bob Carr could have attended.
| Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Feb 2013, 6:32 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Migration Amendment Regulation 2012 (No. 5) - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
28th Nov 2012, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Right to work |
absent | Yes |
28th Jun 2012, 5:05 PM – Senate Migration Legislation Amendment (The Bali Process) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Greens Amendment |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bob Carr has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.