We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Carr voted on increasing marine conservation
How Bob Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation and regulations that protect and conserve Australia's marine ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Bob Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Carr on this policy.
| Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Bob Carr could have attended.
| Division | Bob Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Jun 2013, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Marine Parks - Support Goverment's network of marine parks |
absent | Yes |
20th Jun 2013, 12:15 PM – Senate Motions - Environment - Amend environment laws |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2013, 3:57 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area - Maintain heritage status |
absent | Yes |
22nd Mar 2012, 1:56 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Oppose offshore dumping |
absent | Yes |
22nd Mar 2012, 1:53 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Moratorium on coal seam gas |
absent | Yes |
22nd Mar 2012, 1:50 PM – Senate Motions - Marine Conservation - Moratorium on issuing oil and gas leases |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bob Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.