Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Heffernan on this policy.

Division	Bill Heffernan	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Bill Heffernan could have attended.

Division	Bill Heffernan	Supporters vote
25th Jun 2013, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area - Prohibit logging	No	Yes
20th Jun 2013, 12:11 PM – Senate Motions - National Parks - Protect	absent	Yes
11th May 2010, 4:22 PM – Senate Motions - Environment: Millewa Forest - Stop logging	absent	Yes
19th Mar 2009, 9:49 AM – Senate Motions - Protect the Swift Parrot - Deliberate Actions and Recovery Plan	absent	Yes
4th Dec 2008, 10:39 AM – Senate Motions - Koala Habitat - Protect Bermagui habitat	absent	Yes
29th Nov 2006, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Logging in Tasmania’s Weld River Valley - Halt logging	absent	Yes
28th Mar 2006, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Wedge-Tailed Eagle - Protect habitat	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Bill Heffernan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.